Sexual Sadism: Face the Truth and Stop the Excuses

When you search for the term “sexual sadist”  on Google, the definition given comes from The Free Dictionary.  This links simply to the word “sadism”, which has the following definition:

sa·dism (sdzm, sdz-)
n.
1. The deriving of sexual gratification or the tendency to derive sexual gratification from inflicting pain or emotional abuse on others.
2. The deriving of pleasure, or the tendency to derive pleasure, from cruelty.
3. Extreme cruelty.

While the term appears to be sex-neutral, we know that this is not materially true.  While there are undoubtedly females who fall within the definition, both the practice and the social understanding generally applies to males.  If you have done any research on pornography–both graphic and “literary”–the sadist is presented as male almost universally.  The female sadist is a very, very rare exception to this rule.  Since the majority of porn is aimed at heterosexual males, it follows that the presentation of the masochist or the victim of the sadist is almost universally female.  This goes back to the patriarchal concept of masculine dominance and feminine submission.  The concept that the abuse of women is not only normal, it is what women desire.

In patriarchal society, sadists as a group are divided into two:  the sadist who engages in “consensual” sadomasochistic relations and the sadist whose sadism is “forced”.  There is a refusal–even among the choice proponents in liberal feminism–to acknowledge that the underlying psycho-sexual make-up of the sadist is the same whether the sadism is “consensual” or “forced”.  Indeed, some sadists have entered into “consensual” sadomasochistic relations with the intent of killing their “consenting” partner.  Others have entered these relations with indifference to whether the partner ends up dead or not.  All enter the relations with the idea that torture, humiliation, cruelty, and abuse are sexually satisfying.  Let’s repeat that, so we are all on the same page here:  TORTURE, HUMILIATION, CRUELTY and ABUSE are SEXUALLY SATISFYING.  Torture.  Humiliation.  Cruelty.  And abuse.  Are sexually satisfying.

Indeed, the word “sadism” itself is taken from the name of the Marquis de Sade, a member of the French nobility who was known to kidnap and torture women.  He was not the first to forcibly take women to torture and to humiliate them for his twisted sexual satisfaction, nor was he the last.  He was just the most famous.  Society as a whole recognizes that this type of sadism is wrong.  What society as a whole refuses to condemn is the sadist who engages is so-called consensual sadomasochism.  This, despite the fact that the underlying psycho-sexual make-up and motivations of the “forced” sadist and of the “consensual” sadist are the same.  This, despite the fact that we have plenty of evidence that the so-called “consensual” sadist has been known to kill his female partners in pursuit of sexual gratification.

The serial killer John Edward Robinson recruited his “consensual” sadomasochistic partners via online forums meant for sadomasochistic hook-ups.  The majority of the women he tortured and eventually murdered were not kidnapped.  They were not tricked.  They entered into these relationships “willingly” (assuming that you don’t consider patriarchal conditioning of women to accept submissiveness and abuse coercive).  In the language of liberal feminism, they chose to be there.  They exercised their “agency” by making that “choice”.  And they ended up murdered and stuffed in 55 gallon drums.  As I’ve mentioned before, a friend of mine ended up dead during a “consensual” sadomasochistic encounter.  Her sadistic “partner” suffocated her to death with a plastic dry-cleaning bag.  These are but two examples of men who murdered while engaged in “consensual” sadomasochistic sex.  They are not the only examples.

When more radically minded feminists bring these issues up, they are commonly met with a couple of excuses by males who lay claim political radicalism and by females who claim to be feminists.  One is the “choice” argument.  People who argue against capitalism, racism and other “isms” because they are injurious to groups of people seem to run into problems when it comes to sadism.  Here, they will hypocritically cling to the “individual choice” argument.  Guess what? Some people choose to work for employers who exploit them.  Some people of color choose to join racist organizations like the Republican Party.  A political radical should recognize that “an injury to one is an injury to all”.  They should instinctively know that the protection of the group is what political radicals are supposed to be about.  And they will recognize these things…until it comes to misogyny.  Then, they trot out the “individual” and “choice”.

As I have written previously, some women “choose” to stay with men who beat them–even when they are under no financial constraints that might force them to.  In fact, I have male friends who have seen women being beaten in public places.   When they intervened, the women have verbally or physically attacked them for stopping the beatings.  Does the fact that these women choose to stay with violent men and even physically resist when someone tries to end the violence mean that the violence is acceptable?  Does it mean we should advocate for the violence to continue?

The other argument that is brought up is that the sadist who kills or kidnaps is committing a crime, while the sadist involved in “consensual” sadomasochism isn’t.  Sure.  That’s true, but it’s a weak argument.  Legality doesn’t make something acceptable, and it sure as hell doesn’t make it something to advocate.  The racist who doesn’t actively commit violence against people of color isn’t committing a crime.  Would a so-called political radical or even a liberal then say that racism is just fine?  Would that person not only say that racism is acceptable, but that anyone who condemns racism is unreasonable?  Would that person advocate for the circulation of racist graphics and literature?  Would that person publicly criticize and deride those who fight to end racism?  Did I hear, “No”?  So, why does this suddenly become the directive as soon as women and the male right to violate women come into the picture?

The fundamental issue behind feminist critiques of sadism has nothing to do with legality.  It has nothing to do with the liberal/libertarian veneration of individualism.  It has to do with the radical notions of improving the lot of the oppressed and exploited group.  It has to do with the psycho-sexual foundation of sadism–that torture, humiliation, cruelty and abuse are sexually satisfying.  It has to do with the cultural constructs of “feminine” and of “masculine” that tie femininity to masochism and masculinity to sadism.  It has to do with the ways those ties restrict and influence women’s lives in other aspects of society.  It has to do with the ways that these constructs reinforce rape culture.  It has to do with the ways women are kept as the sex class–open and available to both the most extreme kinds of male abuse and the everyday sexual demands of men they may not even know.  It’s not about what two (or more) individuals do in the bedroom.  It’s about how the underlying ideas endanger and limit women outside the bedroom.

8 responses to “Sexual Sadism: Face the Truth and Stop the Excuses

  1. For every serial killer, accidental death, or otherwise negative fetish related story, there are 50 stories of people enjoying getting their kicks. Once again I question why you wage a War on Consent when the problem is when the consensual line is crossed. Don’t punish the rest of us for the sins of a few.

  2. Troy, I question why refuse to get that the underlying idea that torturing, humiliating and being cruel to women is sexually satisfying indicates a diseased mind. You are the typical liberal who cares more about individualism than about women as a group. Your sexual perversions are tied to woman-hate. That means your hard-on comes from torturing and humiliating women. That’s the earmark of a sociopath.

  3. Uuuuuuuuuum.
    I’m what you would qualify as a queer-radical-feminist. I’m also a masochist.
    I really enjoy being humiliated, beaten and dominated during sex. It’s the only place where I enjoy and tolerate it.
    My partner respects my limits and what I will and will not do. It’s a relationship based on trust…not on hate lol.
    And I can help that it gets me off and that I feel GREAT after it.
    It doesn’t matter what YOU think about it. Not everyone is a sadist or a masochist…and that’s perfectly fine. Why don’t you let us enjoy our passionate sadist sex? It doesn’t really matter that you approve it or not, because we will keep on having and enjoying it.
    I know women who enjoys dominating other women.
    I know trans people who enjoy dominating other women or other trans people.
    I men who enjoy being dominated by other women….
    And it goes on and on…
    The thing is getting off on torture/humiliation isn’t about hating women or hating anybody. It’s about the power dynamic. You’ve got it all wrong, mate.

    • I’m not your “mate”. And your bullshit is the exact bullshit I was referring to in this piece. It’s the “rape happens to men, so it’s not about woman-hate” argument in a different tone. You’re not a radical anything, and you’re sure as hell not a feminist. You’re an apologist for torture and hatred. A fucked up, twisted concept of power dynamics which has brought us to a world where oppression is sexualized and codified. There’s nothing about you that I would want in a just world. People who sexualize torture and humiliation have sexualized the most fucked up parts of patriarchy. It’s downright pathological.

    • By the way, since there seems to be some reading comprehension issues going on here, I’ll reiterate a couple of passages from the piece:

      “While there are undoubtedly females who fall within the definition, both the practice and the social understanding generally applies to males. If you have done any research on pornography–both graphic and “literary”–the sadist is presented as male almost universally. The female sadist is a very, very rare exception to this rule.”

      I’ve known so-called “doms” of the female sex. They were usually doms when working as prostitutes. I’ve also known male “subs”. And they were every bit as woman-hating as any other man. Moreso, in fact. The point, though, is that your so-called “critique” was addressed in the piece.

      A second claim you make was also addressed:

      “It has to do with the cultural constructs of “feminine” and of “masculine” that tie femininity to masochism and masculinity to sadism. It has to do with the ways those ties restrict and influence women’s lives in other aspects of society. It has to do with the ways that these constructs reinforce rape culture. It has to do with the ways women are kept as the sex class–open and available to both the most extreme kinds of male abuse and the everyday sexual demands of men they may not even know. It’s not about what two (or more) individuals do in the bedroom. It’s about how the underlying ideas endanger and limit women outside the bedroom.”

      If you don’t get the ways that patriarchal concepts limit and endanger women’s lives, you’ve just proven you have no grasp of the history of patriarchy and women’s oppression. The concept is used to reinforce the practice of violence, of rape culture, of woman-hate. Mate.

  4. Here’s a little tip to the liberal, self-hating women who come on this site trying to peddle their bullshit. I read half a sentence, see you’re full of shit, and delete your crap without reading it. You can take your internalized patriarchal self-hate elsewhere. I know you all desperately need a man’s pat on the head, so you rush headlong to defend woman-hate as loudly as you possibly can. (Maybe that’s where the need for being tortured by a man comes from to begin with.) I truly, truly pity you. Get some help with that.

Share your thoughts, but be aware that comments on this blog are moderated. Please be patient, as it may take me a few days to moderate comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s